Code of Federal Regulations (alpha)

CFR /  Title 40  /  Part 82  /  Sec. 82.184 Petitions.

(a) Who may petition. Any person may petition the Agency to amend existing listing decisions under the SNAP program, or to add a new substance to any of the SNAP lists.

(b) Types of petitions. Five types of petitions exist:

(1) Petitions to add a substitute not previously reviewed under the SNAP program to the acceptable list. This type of petition is comparable to the 90-day notifications, except that it would generally be initiated by entities other than the companies that manufacture, formulate, or otherwise use the substitute. Companies that manufacture, formulate, or use substitutes that want to have their substitutes added to the acceptable list should submit information on the substitute under the 90-day review program;

(2) Petitions to add a substitute not previously reviewed under the SNAP program to the unacceptable list;

(3) Petitions to delete a substitute from the acceptable list and add it to the unacceptable list or to delete a substitute from the unacceptable and add it to the acceptable list;

(4) Petitions to add or delete use restrictions on an acceptability listing.

(5) Petitions to grandfather use of a substitute listed as unacceptable or acceptable subject to use restrictions.

(c) Content of the petition. The Agency requires that the petitioner submit information on the type of action requested and the rationale for the petition. Petitions in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section must contain the information described in Sec. 82.178, which lists the items to be submitted in a 90-day notification. For petitions that request the re-examination of a substitute previously reviewed under the SNAP program, the submitter must also reference the prior submittal or existing listing. Petitions to grandfather use of an unacceptable substitute must describe the applicability of the test to judge the appropriateness of Agency grandfathering as established by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit (see Sierra Club v. EPA, 719 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1983)). This test includes whether the new rule represents an abrupt departure from previously established practice, the extent to which a party relied on the previous rule, the degree of burden which application of the new rule would impose on the party, and the statutory interest in applying the new rule immediately.

(d) Petition process. (1) Notification of affected companies. If the petition concerns a substitute previously either approved or restricted under the SNAP program, the Agency will contact the original submitter of that substitute.

(1) Notification of affected companies. If the petition concerns a substitute previously either approved or restricted under the SNAP program, the Agency will contact the original submitter of that substitute.

(2) Review for data adequacy. The Agency will review the petition for adequacy of data. As with a 90-day notice, the Agency may suspend review until the petitioner submits the information necessary to evaluate the petition. To reach a timely decision on substitutes, EPA may use collection authorities such as those contained in section 114 of the Clean Air Act as amended, as well as information collection provisions of other environmental statutes.

(3) Review procedures. To evaluate the petition, the Agency may submit the petition for review to appropriate experts inside and outside the Agency.

(4) Timing of determinations. If data are adequate, as described in Sec. 82.180, the Agency will respond to the petition within 90 days of receiving a complete petition. If the petition is inadequately supported, the Agency will query the petitioner to fill any data gaps before the 90-day review period begins, or may deny the petition because data are inadequate.

(5) Rulemaking procedures. EPA will initiate rulemaking whenever EPA grants a petition to add a substance to the list of unacceptable substitutes, remove a substance from any list, or change or create an acceptable listing by imposing or deleting use conditions or use limits.

(6) Communication of decision. The Agency will inform petitioners within 90 days of receiving a complete petition whether their request has been granted or denied. If a petition is denied, the Agency will publish in the Federal Register an explanation of the determination. If a petition is granted, the Agency will publish the revised SNAP list incorporating the final petition decision within 6 months of reaching a determination or in the next scheduled update, if sooner, provided any required rulemaking has been completed within the shorter period.

Sec. Appendix A to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes

Refrigerants

Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-11 centrifugal chillers HCFC-141b............ Unacceptable............ Has a high ODP relative to

(retrofit). other alternatives.

CFC-12 centrifugal chillers HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can used

safely in this end-use.CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114, R- HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

500 centrifugal chillers (new 12. and Class II substances,

equipment/NIKs). it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocabon blend A... Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.

HCFC-141b............ Unacceptable............ Has a high ODP relative to

other alternatives.CFC-12 reciprocating chillers HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12 reciprocating chillers (new HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-11, CFC-12, R-502 industrial HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

process refrigeration (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.CFC-11, CFC-12, R-502 industrial HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

process refrigeration (new 12. and Class II substances,

equipment/NIKs). it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.CFC-12, R-502 ice skating rinks HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 ice skating rinks HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 cold storage HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

warehouses (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 cold storage HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

warehouses (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-500, R-502 refrigerated HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

transport (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-500, R-502 refrigerated HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

transport (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.

CFC-12, R-502 retail food HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

refrigeration (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 retail food HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

refrigeration (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 commercial ice HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

machines (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 commercial ice HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

machines (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12 vending machines (retrofit). HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12 vending machines (new HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, water coolers (retrofit)... HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, water coolers (New HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, household refrigerators HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, household refrigerators HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-502 household freezers HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

(retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, 502 household freezers (new HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-500 residential HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

dehumidifiers (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, R-500 residential HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

dehumidifiers (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, motor vehicle air HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

conditioners (retrofit). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

used safely in this end-

use.CFC-12, motor vehicle air HCFC-22/HFC-142b/CFC- Unacceptable............ As a blend of both Class I

conditioners (new equipment/NIKs). 12. and Class II substances,

it has a higher ODP than

use of Class II

substances.

Hydrocarbon blend A.. Unacceptable............ Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be

sued safely in this end-

use.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Foams

Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-11 Polyolefin................. HCFC-141b (or blends Unacceptable.............. HCFC-141b has an ODP of

thereof). 0.11, almost equivalent

to that of methyl

chloroform, a Class I

substance. The Agency

believes that non-ODP

alternatives are

sufficiently available

to render the use of

HCFC-141b unnecessary in

polyolefin foams.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electronics cleaning w/CFC-113, MCF Perfluoro-carbons Acceptable for high- The principal environmental

(C5F12, C6F12, C6F14, performance, characteristic of concern

C7F16, C8F18, precision-engineered for PFCs is that they have

C5F11NO, C6F13NO, applications only long atmospheric lifetimes

C7F15NO, and C8F16). where reasonable and high global warming

efforts have been potentials. Although

made to ascertain actual contributions to

that other global warming depend upon

alternatives are not the quantities of PFCs

technically feasible emitted, the effects are

due to performance or for practical purposes

safety requirements. irreversible.

Users must observe this

limitation on PFC

acceptability by

conducting a reasonable

evaluation of other

substitutes to determine

that PFC use is necessary

to meet performance or

safety requirements.

Documentation of this

evaluation must be kept on

file.

For additional guidance

regarding applications in

which PFCs may be

appropriate, users should

consult the Preamble for

this rulemaking.

Precision cleaning w/CFC-113, MCF.. Perfluoro-carbons Acceptable for high- The principal environmental

(C5F12, C6F12, C6F14, performance, characteristic of concern

C7F16, C8F18, precision-engineered for PFCs is that they have

C5F11NO, C6F13NO, applications only long atmospheric lifetimes

C7F15NO, and C8F16). where reasonable and high global warming

efforts have been potentials. Although

made to ascertain actual contributions to

that other global warming depend upon

alternatives are not the quantities of PFCs

technically feasible emitted, the effects are

due to performance or for practical purposes

safety requirements. irreversible.

Users must observe this

limitation on PFC

acceptability by

conducting a reasonable

evaluation of other

substitutes to determine

that PFC use is necessary

to meet performance or

safety requirements.

Documentation of this

evaluation must be kept on

file.

For additional guidance

regarding applications in

which PFCs may be

appropriate, users should

consult the Preamble for

this rulemaking.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metals cleaning w/CFC-113......... HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment. EPA will

grant, if necessary,

narrowed use

acceptability listings

for CFC-113 past the

effective date of the

prohibition.Metals cleaning w/MCF............. HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment.Electronics cleaning w/CFC-113.... HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment. EPA will

grant, if necessary,

narrowed use

acceptability listings

for CFC-113 past the

effective date of the

prohibition.Electronics cleaning w/MCF........ HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment.Precision cleaning w/CFC-113...... HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment. EPA will

grant, if necessary,

narrowed use

acceptability listings

for CFC-113 past the

effective date of the

prohibition.Precision cleaning w/MCF.......... HCFC 141b and its Unacceptable.............. High ODP; other

blends. alternatives exist.

Effective date: As of 30

days after final rule

for uses in new

equipment (including

retrofits made after the

effective date); as of

January 1, 1996, for

uses in existing

equipment.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Streaming Agents

Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1211 Streaming Agents.. [CFC Blend].......... Acceptable in ................. Use of CFCs are

nonresidential controlled under CAA

uses only. section 610 which

bans use of CFCs in

pressurized

dispensers, and

therefore are not

permitted for use in

portable fire

extinguishers. EPA

will list this agent

as proposed

unacceptable in the

next SNAP proposed

rulemaking.

Because CFCs are a

Class I substance,

production will be

phased out by

January 1, 1996.

See additional

comments 1, 2.

HBFC-22B1............ ................ Acceptable in Proper procedures

nonresidential regarding the

uses only. operation of the

extinguisher and

ventilation

following dispensing

the extinguishant is

recommended. Worker

exposure may be a

concern in small

office areas.

HBFC-22B1 is

considered an

interim substitute

for Halon 1211.

Because the HBFC-

22B1 has an ODP of

.74, production will

be phased out

(except for

essential uses) on

January 1, 1996.

This agent was

submitted to the

Agency as a

Premanufacture

Notice (PMN) and is

presently subject to

requirements

contained in a Toxic

Substance Control

Act (TSCA) Consent

Order.

See additional

comments 1, 2.

C6 F14............... Acceptable for ................. Users must observe

nonresidential the limitations on

uses where PFC acceptability by

other making reasonable

alternatives effort to undertake

are not the following

technically measures:

feasible due to (i) conduct an

performance or evaluation of

safety foreseeable

requirements:. conditions of end

use;

(ii) determine that

the physical or

chemical properties

or other technical

constraints of the

other available

agents preclude

their use; and

a. due to the ................. (iii) determine that

physical or human exposure to

chemical the other

properties of alternative

the agent, or. extinguishing agents

may approach or

result in

cardiosensitization

or other

unacceptable

toxicity effects

under normal

operating

conditions;

Documentation of such

measures must be

available for review

upon request.

b. where human ................. The principal

exposure to the environmental

extinguishing characteristic of

agent may concern for PFCs is

approach that they have high

cardiosensitiza GWPs and long

tion levels or atmospheric

result in other lifetimes. Actual

unacceptable contributions to

health effects global warming

under normal depend upon the

operating quantities of PFCs

conditions. emitted.

For additional

guidance regarding

applications in

which PFCs may be

appropriate, users

should consult the

description of

potential uses which

is included in the

preamble to this

rulemaking.

See additional

comments 1, 2.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional Comments:1--Discharge testing and training should be strictly limited only to that which is essential to meet safety or

performance requirements.2--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Streaming Agents

Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1211 Streaming Agents....... [CFC-11]............. Unacceptable.............. This agent has been

suggested for use on

large outdoor fires for

which non-ozone

depleting alternatives

are currently used.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [59 FR 13147, Mar. 18, 1994, as amended at 67 FR 4200, Jan. 29, 2002]

Sec. Appendix B to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes

Refrigerants--Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-12 Automobile Motor Vehicle HFC-134a, R-401C, Acceptable....... --must be used EPA is concerned that

Air Conditioning (Retrofit and HCFC Blend Beta. with unique the existence of

New Equipment/NIKS). fittings. several substitutes

--must be used in this end-use may

with detailed increase the

labels. likelihood of

--all CFC-12 must significant

be removed from refrigerant cross-

the system prior contamination and

to retrofitting. potential failure of

Refer to the text both air conditioning

for a full systems and recovery/

description. recycling equipment.

For the purposes of

this rule, no

distinction is made

between ``retrofit''

and ``drop-in''

refrigerants;

retrofitting a car to

use a new refrigerant

includes all

procedures that

result in the air

conditioning system

using a new

refrigerant.CFC-12 Automobile Motor Vehicle R-152a as a Acceptable Engineering Additional training

Air Conditioning (New substitute for subject to use strategies and/ for service

equipment only). CFC-12. conditions. or devices shall technicians

be incorporated recommended.

into the system Manufacturers should

such that conduct and keep on

foreseeable file failure mode and

leaks into the Effect Analysis

passenger (FMEA) on the MVAC as

compartment do stated in SAE J1739.

not result in R-

152a

concentrations

of 3.7% v/v or

above in any

part of the free

space\1\ inside

the passenger

compartment for

more than 15

seconds when the

car ignition is

on.

Manufacturers

must adhere to

all the safety

requirements

listed in the

Society of

Automotive

Engineers (SAE)

Standard J639,

including unique

fittings and a

flammable

refrigerant

warning label as

well as SAE

Standard J2773.

CFC-12 Automobile Motor Vehicle HFO-1234yf as a Acceptable Manufacturers Additional training

Air Conditioning (New substitute for subject to use must adhere to for service

equipment in passenger cars CFC-12. conditions. all of the technicians

and light-duty trucks only). safety recommended.

requirements Observe requirements

listed in the of Significant New

Society of Use Rule at 40 CFR

Automotive 721.10182.

Engineers (SAE) HFO-1234yf is also

Standard J639 known as 2,3,3,3-

(adopted 2011), tetrafluoro-prop-1-

including ene (CAS No 754-12-

requirements 1).

for: unique Refrigerant containers

fittings, of HFO-1234yf for use

flammable in professional

refrigerant servicing are from 5

warning label, lbs (2.3 L) to 50 lbs

high-pressure (23 L) in size.

compressor Requirements for

cutoff switch handling, storage,

and pressure and transportation of

relief devices. compressed gases

For connections apply to this

with refrigerant refrigerant, such as

containers for regulations of the

use in Occupational Safety

professional and Health

servicing (that Administration at 29

is, service for CFR 1910.101 and the

consideration, Department of

consistent with Transportation's

subpart B to 40 requirements at 49

CFR part 82), CFR 171-179.

use fittings

consistent with

SAE J2844

(revised October

2011).

Manufacturers Requirements for

must conduct handling, storage,

Failure Mode and and transportation of

Effect Analysis compressed gases

(FMEA) as apply to this

provided in SAE refrigerant, such as

J1739 (adopted regulations of the

2009). Occupational Safety

Manufacturers and Health

must keep the Administration at 29

FMEA on file for CFR 1910.101 and the

at least three Department of

years from the Transportation's

date of creation. requirements at 49

CFR 171-179.CFC-12 Motor Vehicle Air Carbon dioxide Acceptable Engineering Additional training

Conditioning (New equipment (CO2) as a subject to use strategies and/ for service

only). substitute for conditions. or mitigation technicians is

CFC-12. devices shall be recommended.

incorporated

such that in the

event of

refrigerant

leaks, the

resulting CO2

concentrations

do not exceed:

The short term In designing risk

exposure level mitigation strategies

(STEL) of 3% or and/or devices,

30,000 ppm manufacturers should

averaged over 15 factor in background

minutes in the CO2 concentrations in

passenger free the passenger cabin

space \1\; and; potentially

The ceiling limit contributed from

of 4% or 40,000 normal respiration by

ppm in the the maximum number of

passenger vehicle occupants.

breathing

zone.\2\.

Vehicle Use of the standards

manufacturers SAE J1052, SAE J2772,

must keep and SAE J2773 is

records of the recommended as

tests performed additional reference.

for a minimum

period of three

years

demonstrating

that CO2

refrigerant

levels do not

exceed the STEL

of 3% averaged

over 15 minutes

in the passenger

free space, and

the ceiling

limit of 4% in

the breathing

zone.

The use of CO2 in Manufacturers should

MVAC systems conduct and keep on

must adhere to file Potential

the standard Failure Mode and

conditions Effects Analysis in

identified in Design [Design FMEA],

SAE Standard Potential Failure

J639 (2011 Mode and Effect

version) Analysis in

including: Manufacturing and

Installation of a Assembly Process

high pressure [Process FMEA] on the

system warning MVAC as stated in SAE

label;. J1739.

Installation of a

compressor cut-

off switch; and.

Use of unique

fittings with:.

Outside diameter

of 16.6 +0/-0.2

mm (0.6535 +0/-

0.0078 inches)

for the MVAC low-

side;.

Outside diameter

of 18.1 +0/-0.2

mm (0.7126 +0/-

0.0078 inches)

for the MVAC

high-side; and.

Outside diameter

of 20.955 +0/-

0.127 mm (0.825

+0/-0.005

inches) and

right-hand

thread direction

for CO2

refrigerant

service

containers.\3\.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\1\ Free space is defined as the space inside the passenger compartment excluding the space enclosed by the

ducting in the HVAC module.\2\ Area inside the passenger compartment where the driver's and passengers' heads are located during a normal

sitting position. Refer to SAE J1052 for information on determining passenger head position.\3\ The refrigerant service containers fitting requirement applies only to refrigerant service containers used

during servicing of the MVAC, in accordance with the provisions established for MVAC servicing under 40 CFR

part 82, subpart B.

Note: The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from SAE Customer Service, 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096-0001 USA; email: CustomerService@sae.org; Telephone: 1-877-606-7323 (U.S. and Canada only) or 1-724-776-4970 (outside the U.S. and Canada); Internet address: http://store.sae.org/dlabout.htm. You may inspect a copy at U.S. EPA's Air Docket; EPA West Building, Room 3334; 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.; Washington, DC or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For questions regarding access to these standards, the telephone number of EPA's Air Docket is 202-566-1742. For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Refrigerants--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114, C3 F8, C4 F10, C5 F12, Acceptable only where Users must observe the

CFC-115 Non-Mechanical Heat C5 F11 NO, C6 F14, C6 no other alternatives limitations on PFC

Transfer, New. F13 NO, C7 F16, C7 are technically acceptability by

F15 NO, C8 F18, C8 feasible due to determining that the

F16 O, and C9 F21 N. safety or performance physical or chemical

requirements. properties or other

technical constraints of

the other available agents

preclude their use.

Documentation of such

measures must be available

for review upon request.

The principal environmental

characteristic of concern

for PFCs is that they have

high GWPs and long

atmospheric lifetimes. EPA

strongly recommends

recovery and recycling of

these substitutes.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Refrigerants--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-11, CFC-12, CFC-113, CFC-114, R- R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

500 Centrifugal Chillers (Retrofit PFC, which has an

and New Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12 Reciprocating Chillers R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

(Retrofit and New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-11, CFC-12, R-502 Industrial R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

Process Refrigeration (Retrofit PFC, which has an

and New Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.CFC-12, R-502 Ice Skating Rinks R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

(Retrofit and New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-502 Cold Storage R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

Warehouses (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-500, R-502 Refrigerated R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

Transport (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-502 Retail Food R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

Refrigeration (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-502 Commercial Ice R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

Machines (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12 Vending Machines (Retrofit R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

and New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12 Water Coolers (Retrofit and R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12 Household Refrigerators R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

(Retrofit and New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-502 Household Freezers R-403B................ Unacceptable.......... R-403B contains R-218, a

(Retrofit and New Equipment/NIKs). PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

PFC, which has an

extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12, R-500 Residential R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

Dehumidifiers (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.CFC-12 Motor Vehicle Air R-405A................ Unacceptable.......... R-405A contains R-c318, a

Conditioners (Retrofit and New PFC, which has an

Equipment/NIKs). extremely high GWP and

lifetime. Other

Substitutes exist which do

not contain PFCs.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hydrocarbon Blend B... Unacceptable.......... Flammability is a serious

concern. Data have not

been submitted to

demonstrate it can be used

safely in this end-use.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flammable Substitutes, Unacceptable.......... The risks associated with

other than R-152a or using flammable

HFO-1234yf in new substitutes (except R-152a

equipment. and HFO-1234yf) in this

end-use have not been

addressed by a risk

assessment. R-152a and HFO-

1234yf may be used in new

equipment with the use

conditions in appendix B

to this subpart.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Solvent Cleaning Sector--Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electronics Cleaning w/CFC-113, HCFC-225 ca/cb.... Acceptable........ Subject to the HCFC-225 ca/cb

MCF. company set blend is offered

exposure limit of as a 45%-ca/55%-

25 ppm of the -ca cb blend. The

isomer. company set

exposure limit of

the -ca isomer is

25 ppm. The

company set

exposure limit of

the -cb isomer is

250 ppm. It is

the Agency's

opinion that with

the low emission

cold cleaning and

vapor degreasing

equipment

designed for this

use, the 25 ppm

limit of the HCFC-

225 ca isomer can

be met. The

company is

submitting

further exposure

monitoring data.Precision Cleaning w/CFC-113, HCFC-225 ca/cb.... Acceptable........ Subject to the HCFC-225 ca/cb

MCF. company set blend is offered

exposure limit of as a 45%-ca/55%-

25 ppm of the -ca cb blend. The

isomer. company set

exposure limit of

the -ca isomer is

25 ppm. The

company set

exposure limit of

the -cb isomer is

250 ppm. It is

the Agency's

opinion that with

the low emission

cold cleaning and

vapor degreasing

equipment

designed for this

use, the 25 ppm

limit of the HCFC-

225 ca isomer can

be met. The

company is

submitting

further exposure

monitoring data.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Solvent Cleaning Sector--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metals cleaning w/CFC-113..... Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.Metals cleaning w/MCF......... Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.Electronics cleaning w/CFC-113 Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.Electronics cleaning w/MCF.... Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.Precision cleaning w/CFC-113.. Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.Precision cleaning w/MCF...... Dibromomethane................ Unacceptable.................. High ODP; other

alternatives

exist.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions: Total Flooding Agents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1301 Total Flooding Inert Gas/ Acceptable as a In areas where The manufacturer's

Agents. Powdered Aerosol Halon 1301 personnel could SNAP application

Blend. substitute in possibly be requested listing for

normally present, as in a use in unoccupied

unoccupied areas. cargo area, EPA areas only.

requires that See additional comment

the employer 2.

shall provide a

pre-discharge

employee alarm

capable of being

perceived above

ambient light or

noise levels for

alerting

employees before

system

discharge. The

pre-discharge

alarm shall

provide

employees time

to safely exit

the discharge

area prior to

system discharge.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional Comments1--Must conform with OSHA 29 CFR 1910 Subpart L Section 1910.160 of the U.S. Code. You should use clean agents

in accordance with the safety guidelines in the latest edition of the NFPA 2001 Standard for Clean Agent Fire

Extinguishing Systems.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) must be available in the event personnel must enter/reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited only to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits: Total Flooding Agents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Further information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total flooding................. Sulfurhexafluorid Acceptable May be used as a This agent has an

e (SF6). subject to discharge test atmospheric lifetime

narrowed use in agent in greater than 1,000

limits. military uses years, with an

and in civilian estimated 100-year,

aircraft uses 500-year, and 1,000-

only. year GWP of 16,100,

26,110 and 32,803

respectively. Users

should limit testing

only to that which is

essential to meet

safety or performance

requirements.

This agent is only

used to test new

Halon 1301 systems.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3, 4,

5.Total flooding................. CF3I............. Acceptable Use only in Use of this agent

subject to normally should be in

narrowed use unoccupied areas. accordance with the

limits. safety guidelines in

the latest edition of

the NFPA 2001

Standard for Clean

Agent Fire

Extinguishing

Systems.

Manufacturer has not

applied for listing

for use in normally

occupied areas.

Preliminary

cardiosensitization

data indicates that

this agent would not

be suitable for use

in normally occupied

areas.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3, 4,

5.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Must conform with relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, Subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1301 Total Flooding Agents... HFC-32................ Unacceptable.......... Data indicate that HFC-32

is flammable and therefore

is not suitable as a halon

substitute.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [60 FR 31103, June 13, 1995, as amended at 67 FR 4200, Jan. 29, 2002; 73 FR 33310, June 12, 2008; 76 FR 17519, Mar. 29, 2011; 77 FR 17350, Mar. 26, 2012; 77 FR 33330, June 6, 2012]

Sec. Appendix C to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes Listed in the May 22, 1996

Final Rule, Effective June 21, 1996

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector--Acceptable Subject to Use

Conditions

HCFC Blend Delta and Blend Zeta are acceptable subject to the following conditions when used to retrofit a CFC-12 motor vehicle air conditioning system:

1. Each refrigerant may only be used with a set of fittings that is unique to that refrigerant. These fittings (male or female, as appropriate) must be used with all containers of the refrigerant, on can taps, on recovery, recycling, and charging equipment, and on all air conditioning system service ports. These fittings must be designed to mechanically prevent cross-charging with another refrigerant. A refrigerant may only be used with the fittings and can taps specifically intended for that refrigerant. Using an adapter or deliberately modifying a fitting to use a different refrigerant will be a violation of this use condition. In addition, fittings shall meet the following criteria, derived from Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standards and recommended practices:

a. When existing CFC-12 service ports are to be retrofitted, conversion assemblies shall attach to the CFC-12 fitting with a thread lock adhesive and/or a separate mechanical latching mechanism in a manner that permanently prevents the assembly from being removed.

b. All conversion assemblies and new service ports must satisfy the vibration testing requirements of sections 3.2.1 or 3.2.2 of SAE J1660, as applicable, excluding references to SAE J639 and SAE J2064, which are specific to HFC-134a.

c. In order to prevent discharge of refrigerant to the atmosphere, systems shall have a device to limit compressor operation before the pressure relief device will vent refrigerant. This requirement is waived for systems that do not feature such a pressure relief device.

d. All CFC-12 service ports not retrofitted with conversion assemblies shall be rendered permanently incompatible for use with CFC-12 related service equipment by fitting with a device attached with a thread lock adhesive and/or a separate mechanical latching mechanism in a manner that prevents the device from being removed.

2. When a retrofit is performed, a label must be used as follows:

a. The person conducting the retrofit must apply a label to the air conditioning system in the engine compartment that contains the following information:

i. The name and address of the technician and the company performing the retrofit.

ii. The date of the retrofit.

iii. The trade name, charge amount, and, when applicable, the ASHRAE refrigerant numerical designation of the refrigerant.

iv. The type, manufacturer, and amount of lubricant used.

v. If the refrigerant is or contains an ozone-depleting substance, the phrase ``ozone depleter.''

vi. If the refrigerant displays flammability limits as measured according to ASTM E681, the statement ``This refrigerant is FLAMMABLE. Take appropriate precautions.''

b. This label must be large enough to be easily read and must be permanent.

c. The background color must be unique to the refrigerant.

d. The label must be affixed to the system over information related to the previous refrigerant, in a location not normally replaced during vehicle repair.

e. Information on the previous refrigerant that cannot be covered by the new label must be permanently rendered unreadable.

3. No substitute refrigerant may be used to ``top-off'' a system that uses another refrigerant. The original refrigerant must be recovered in accordance with regulations issued under section 609 of the CAA prior to charging with a substitute.

Solvent Cleaning Sector--Proposed Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metals Cleaning with CFC-113, Monochlorotoluenes Acceptable....... Subject to a 50 The workplace

MCF and HCFC-141b. and ppm workplace standard for

benzotrifluorides. standard for monochlorotoluene

monochlorotoluene s is based on an

s and a 25 ppm OSHA PEL of 50

standard for ppm for

benzotrifluorides. orthochlorotoluen

e. The workplace

standard for

benzotrifluorides

is based on a

recent toxicology

study.Electronics Cleaning w/ CFC-113, Monochlorotoluenes Acceptable....... Subject to a 50 The workplace

MCF and HCFC-141b. and ppm workplace standard for

benzotrifluorides. standard for monochlorotoluene

monochlorotoluene s is based on an

s and a 25 ppm OSHA PEL of 50

standard for ppm for

benzotrifluorides. orthochlorotoluen

e. The workplace

standard for

benzotrifluorides

is based on a

recent toxicology

study.

Precision Cleaning w/ CFC-113, Monochlorotoluenes Acceptable....... Subject to a 50 The workplace

MCF and HCFC-141b. and ppm workplace standard for

benzotrifluorides. standard for monochlorotoluene

monochlorotoluene s is based on an

s and a 25 ppm OSHA PEL of 50

standard for ppm for

benzotrifluorides. orthochlorotoluen

e. The workplace

standard for

benzotrifluorides

is based on a

recent toxicology

study.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits: Streaming Agents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1211........................... CF3 I................. Acceptable in non-

residential uses only.Streaming Agents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aerosols--Proposed Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-113, MCF and HCFC-141b as Monochlorotoluenes Acceptable....... Subject to a 50 The workplace

solvent. and benzotrifluo- ppm workplace standard for

rides. standard for monochlorotoluene

monochlorotoluene s is based on an

s and a 25 ppm OSHA PEL of 50

standard for ppm for

benzotrifluorides. orthochlorotoluen

e. The workplace

standard for

benzotrifluorides

is based on a

recent toxicology

study.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adhesives, Coatings and Inks--Proposed Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-113, MCF and HCFC-141b...... Monochlorotoluenes Acceptable....... Subject to a 50 The workplace

and benzotrifluo- ppm workplace standard for

rides. standard for monochlorotoluene

monochlorotoluene s is based on an

s and a 25 ppm OSHA PEL of 50

standard for ppm for

benzotrifluorides. orthochlorotoluen

e. The workplace

standard for

benzotrifluorides

is based on a

recent toxicology

study.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [61 FR 25592, May 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 4201, Jan. 29, 2002]

Effective Date Note: At 61 FR 25592, May 22, 1996, Appendix C to Part 82 Subpart G was added. This appendix contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements which will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.

Sec. Appendix D to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes

Summary of Decisions

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Sector Acceptable Subject to Use

Conditions

R-406A/``GHG''/``McCool'', ``GHG-HP'', ``GHG-X4''/``Autofrost''/``Chill-It'', and ``Hot Shot''/``Kar Kool'' are acceptable substitutes for CFC-12 in retrofitted motor vehicle air conditioning systems (MVACs) subject to the use condition that a retrofit to these refrigerants must include replacing non-barrier hoses with barrier hoses.

For all refrigerants submitted for use in motor vehicle air conditioning systems, subsequent to the effective date of this FRM, in addition to the information previously required in the March 18, 1994 final SNAP rule (58 FR 13044), SNAP submissions must include specifications for the fittings similar to those found in SAE J639, samples of all fittings, and the detailed label described below at the same time as the initial SNAP submission, or the submission will be considered incomplete. Under section 612 of the Clean Air Act, substitutes for which submissions are incomplete may not be sold or used, regardless of other acceptability determinations, and the prohibition against sale of a new refrigerant will not end until 90 days after EPA determines the submission is complete.

In addition, the use of a) R-406A/``GHG''/``McCool'', ``GHG-HP'', ``GHG-X4/``Autofrost''/``Chill-It'', ``Hot Shot''/``Kar Kool'', and ``FREEZE 12'' as CFC-12 substitutes in MVACs, and b) all refrigerants submitted for, and listed in, subsequent Notices of Acceptability as substitutes for CFC-12 in MVACs, must meet the following conditions:

1. Each refrigerant may only be used with a set of fittings that is unique to that refrigerant. These fittings (male or female, as appropriate) must be designed by the manufacturer of the refrigerant. The manufacturer is responsible to ensure that the fittings meet all of the requirements listed below, including testing according to SAE standards. These fittings must be designed to mechanically prevent cross-charging with another refrigerant, including CFC-12.

The fittings must be used on all containers of the refrigerant, on can taps, on recovery, recycling, and charging equipment, and on all air conditioning system service ports. A refrigerant may only be used with the fittings and can taps specifically intended for that refrigerant and designed by the manufacturer of the refrigerant. Using a refrigerant with a fitting designed by anyone else, even if it is different from fittings used with other refrigerants, is a violation of this use condition. Using an adapter or deliberately modifying a fitting to use a different refrigerant is a violation of this use condition.

Fittings shall meet the following criteria, derived from Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standards and recommended practices:

a. When existing CFC-12 service ports are retrofitted, conversion assemblies shall attach to the CFC-12 fitting with a thread lock adhesive and/or a separate mechanical latching mechanism in a manner that permanently prevents the assembly from being removed.

b. All conversion assemblies and new service ports must satisfy the vibration testing requirements of section 3.2.1 or 3.2.2 of SAE J1660, as applicable, excluding references to SAE J639 and SAE J2064, which are specific to HFC-134a.

c. In order to prevent discharge of refrigerant to the atmosphere, systems shall have a device to limit compressor operation before the pressure relief device will vent refrigerant.

d. All CFC-12 service ports not retrofitted with conversion assemblies shall be rendered permanently incompatible for use with CFC-12 related service equipment by fitting with a device attached with a thread lock adhesive and/or a separate mechanical latching mechanism in a manner that prevents the device from being removed.

2. When a retrofit is performed, a label must be used as follows:

a. The person conducting the retrofit must apply a label to the air conditioning system in the engine compartment that contains the following information:

i. The name and address of the technician and the company performing the retrofit.

ii. The date of the retrofit.

iii. The trade name, charge amount, and, when applicable, the ASHRAE refrigerant numerical designation of the refrigerant.

iv. The type, manufacturer, and amount of lubricant used.

v. If the refrigerant is or contains an ozone-depleting substance, the phrase ``ozone depleter''.

vi. If the refrigerant displays flammability limits as measured according to ASTM E681, the statement ``This refrigerant is FLAMMABLE. Take appropriate precautions.''

b. The label must be large enough to be easily read and must be permanent.

c. The background color must be unique to the refrigerant.

d. The label must be affixed to the system over information related to the previous refrigerant, in a location not normally replaced during vehicle repair.

e. In accordance with SAE J639, testing of labels must meet ANSI/UL 969-1991.

f. Information on the previous refrigerant that cannot be covered by the new label must be rendered permanently unreadable.

3. No substitute refrigerant may be used to ``top-off'' a system that uses another refrigerant. The original refrigerant must be recovered in accordance with regulations issued under section 609 of the CAA prior to charging with a substitute.

Solvent Cleaning Sector

[Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions Substitutes]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electronics Cleaning w/CFC-113 HFC-4310mee....... Acceptable........ Subject to a 200 ppm

and MCF. time-weighted

average workplace

exposure standard

and a 400 ppm

workplace exposure

ceiling.

Precision Cleaning w/CFC-113 and HFC-4310mee....... Acceptable........ Subject to a 200 ppm

MCF. time-weighted

average workplace

exposure standard

and a 400 ppm

workplace exposure

ceiling.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Solvent Sector

[Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electronics Cleaning w/CFC-113 and Perfluoropolyethers..... Perfluoropolyethers are PFPEs have similar

MCF. acceptable substitutes global warming profile

for CFC-113 and MCF in to the PFCs, and the

the precision cleaning SNAP decision on PFPEs

sector for high parallels that for

performance, precision- PFCs.

engineered

applications only

where reasonable

efforts have been made

to ascertain that

other alternatives are

not technically

feasible due to

performance or safety

requirements.Precision Cleaning w/CFC-113 and MCF Perfluoropolyethers..... Perfluoropolyethers are PFPEs have similar

acceptable substitutes global warming profile

for CFC-113 and MCF in to the PFCs, and the

the precision cleaning SNAP decision on PFPEs

sector for high parallels that for

performance, precision- PFCs.

engineered

applications only

where reasonable

efforts have been made

to ascertain that

other alternatives are

not technically

feasible due to

performance or safety

requirements.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Electronics Cleaning w/CFC-113 and HCFC-141b............. Extension of existing This determination

MCF. unacceptability extends the use date

determination to grant for HCFC-141b in

existing uses in high- solvent cleaning, but

performance electronics only for existing

permission to continue users in high-

until January 1, 1997. performance

electronics and only

for one year.Precision Cleaning w/CFC-113 and MCF. HCFC-141b............. Extension of existing This determination

unacceptability extends the use date

determination to grant for HCFC-141b in

existing uses in solvent cleaning, but

precision cleaning only for existing

permission to continue users in precision

until January 1, 1997. cleaning and only for

one year.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aerosols Sector

Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Application Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-113, MCF, and HCFC-141b as Perfluorocarbons........ Perfluorocarbons are PFCs have extremely

aerosol solvents. acceptable substitutes long atmospheric

for aerosol lifetimes and high

applications only Global Warming

where reasonable Potentials. This

efforts have been made decision reflects

to ascertain that these concerns and is

other alternatives are patterned after the

not technically SNAP decision on PFCs

feasible due to in the solvent

performance or safety cleaning sector.

requirements.

Perfluoropolyethers..... Perfluorocarbons are PFPEs have similar

acceptable substitutes global warming profile

for aerosol to the PFCs, and the

applications only SNAP decision on PFPEs

where reasonable parallels that for

efforts have been made PFCs in the solvent

to ascertain that cleaning sector.

other alternatives are

not technically

feasible due to

performance or safety

requirements.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unacceptable Substitutes------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-11, CFC-12, HCFC-22, and SF6....... Unacceptable. SF6 has the

HCFC-142b as aerosol highest GWP of

propellants. all industrial

gases, and

other

compressed

gases meet

user needs in

this

application

equally well.------------------------------------------------------------------------ [61 FR 54040, Oct. 16, 1996] Sec. Appendix E to Subpart G of Part 82--Unacceptable Substitutes Listed

in the January 26, 1999 Final Rule, Effective January 26, 1999

Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Sector Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------All refrigeration and air- MT-31 Unacceptable.......... Chemical contained in this blend

conditioning end uses. presents unacceptable toxicity

risk.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [64 FR 3865, Jan. 26, 1999] Sec. Appendix F to Subpart G of Part 82--Unacceptable Substitutes Listed

in the January 26, 1999 Final Rule, Effective January 26, 1999

Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Sector UnacceptabLe Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------All refrigeration and air- Hexafluoropropylene Unacceptable........ Presents unacceptable toxicity

conditioning end uses. (HFP) and all HFP- risk.

containing blends.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [64 FR 3868, Jan. 26, 1999]

Sec. Appendix G to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes Listed in the March 3, 1999,

Final rule, Effective April 2, 1999.

Refrigerants Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CFC-12, R-502, and HCFC-22 Household Self-Chilling Cans-Using Unacceptable.......... Unacceptably high

Refrigeration, Transport HFC-134a or HFC-152a. greenhouse gas

Refrigeration, Vending Machines, emissions from direct

Cold Storage Warehouses, and Retail release of refrigerant

Food Refrigeration, Retrofit and New. to the atmosphere.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [64 FR 10378, Mar. 3, 1999]

Sec. Appendix H to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes, Effective May 28, 1999

CFC-12 Automobile and Non-automobile Motor Vehicle Air Conditioners,

Retrofit and New

Criteria for Uniqueness of Fittings

(a) All fittings for alternative motor vehicle refrigerants must meet the following requirements:

(1) High-side screw-on fittings for each refrigerant must differ from high-side screw-on fittings for all other refrigerants, including CFC-12, and from low-side screw-on fittings for CFC-12;

(2) Low-side screw-on fittings for each refrigerant must differ from low-side screw-on fittings for all other refrigerants, including CFC-12;

(3) High-side screw-on fittings for a given refrigerant must differ from low-side screw-on fittings for that refrigerant, to protect against connecting a low-pressure system to a high-pressure one;

(4) High-side quick-connect fittings for each refrigerant must differ from high-side quick-connect fittings for all other refrigerants, including CFC-12 (if they exist);

(5) Low-side quick-connect fittings for each refrigerant must differ from low-side quick-connect fittings for all other refrigerants, including CFC-12 (if they exist);

(6) High-side quick-connect fittings for a given refrigerant must differ from low-side quick-connect fittings for that refrigerant, to protect against connecting a low-pressure system to a high-pressure one;

(7) For each type of container, the fitting for each refrigerant must differ from the fitting for that type of container for all other refrigerants, including CFC-12.

(b) For screw-on fittings, ``differ'' means that either the diameter must differ by at least \1/16\ inch or the thread direction must be reversed (i.e. right-handed vs. left-handed). Simply changing the thread pitch is not sufficient. For quick-connect fittings, ``differ'' means that a person using normal force and normal tools (including wrenches) must not be able to cross-connect fittings.

(c) The sole exception to the \1/16\ inch difference requirement is the difference between the small can fittings for GHG-X4 and R-406A. The GHG-X4 small can fitting uses a metric measurement, and is slightly less than \1/16\ inch larger than the small can fitting for R-406A. EPA has concluded that these fittings will not cross-connect, and therefore they may be used.

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------All HCFC-22 end-uses, retrofit and NARM-22............... Unacceptable.......... This blend contains HCFC-

new. 22, and it is

inappropriate to use such

a blend as a substitute

for HCFC-22. In addition,

this blend contains HFC-

23, which has an extremely

high GWP and lifetime.

Other substitutes for HCFC-

22 exist that do not

contain either HCFC-22 or

HFC-23.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Solvents Cleaning--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Metals, Electronic, and Precision Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

cleaning with CFC-113, methyl with zero or much lower

chloroform, and HCFC-141b. ODP.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits: Total Flooding Agents----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Further information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total flooding................... HFC-236fa Acceptable Acceptable when Use of this agent

subject to manufactured using any should be in

narrowed use process that does not accordance with

limits. convert the safety

perfluoroisobutylene guidelines in the

(PFIB) directly to HFC- latest edition of

236fa in a single step: the NFPA 2001

for use in explosion Standard for Clean

suppression and Agent Fire

explosion inertion Systems.

applications, and Users should

for use in fire observe the

suppression limitations on HFC-

applications where 236fa

other non-PFC agents or acceptability by

alternatives are not taking the

technically feasible following

due to performance or measures:

safety requirements: (i) conduct an

(a) because of their evaluation of

physical or chemical foreseeable

properties, or conditions of end-

(b) where human exposure use;

to the extinguishing (ii) determine that

agents may result in the physical or

failure to meet safety chemical

guidelines in the properties, or

latest edition of the other technical

NFPA 2001 Standard for constraints of the

Clean Agent Fire other available

Extinguishing Systems. agents preclude

their use; and

(iii) determine

that human

exposure to the

other alternative

extinguishing

agents may result

in failure to meet

safety guidelines

in the latest

edition of the

NFPA 2001 Standard

for Clean Agent

Fire Extinguishing

Systems.

........................ Documentation of

such measures

should be

available for

review upon

request.

The principal

environmental

characteristic of

concern for HFC-

236fa is its high

GWP of 9400 and

long atmospheric

lifetime of 226

years. Actual

contributions to

global warming

depend upon the

quantities

emitted.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.

Total flooding................... C3F8 Acceptable Acceptable for Use of this agent

subject to nonresidential uses should be in

narrowed use where other accordance with

limits. alternatives are not the safety

technically feasible guidelines in the

due to performance or latest edition of

safety requirements: the NFPA 2001

(a) because of their Standard for Clean

physical or chemical Agent Fire

properties, or Extinguishing

(b) where human exposure Systems.

to the extinguishing Users should

agents may result in observe the

failure to meet safety limitations on PFC

guidelines in the acceptability by

latest edition of the taking the

NFPA 2001 Standard for following

Clean Agent Fire measures:

(i) conduct an

evaluation of

foreseeable

conditions of end-

use;

(ii) determine that

the physical or

chemical

properties or

other technical

constraints of the

other available

agents preclude

their use; and

(iii) determine

that human

exposure to the

other alternative

extinguishing

agents may result

in failure to meet

safety guidelines

in the latest

edition of the

NFPA 2001 Standard

for Clean Agent

Fire Extinguishing

Systems.

Documentation of

such measures

should be

available for

review upon

request.

The principal

environmental

characteristic of

concern for PFCs

is that they have

high GWPs and long

atmospheric

lifetimes. Actual

contributions to

global warming

depend upon the

quantities of PFCs

emitted.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.Total flooding................... C4F10 Acceptable Acceptable for Use of this agent

subject to nonresidential uses should be in

narrowed use where other accordance with

limits alternatives are not the safety

technically feasible guidelines in the

due to performance or latest edition of

safety requirements: the NFPA 2001

(a) because of their Standard for Clean

physical or chemical Agent Fire

properties, or Extinguishing

(b) where human exposure Systems.

to the extinguishing Users should

agents may result in observe the

failure to meet safety limitations on PFC

guidelinesin the latest acceptability by

edition of the NFPA taking the

2001 Standard for Clean following

Agent Fire measures:

Extinguishing Systems (i) conduct an

evaluation of

foreseeable

conditions of end-

use;

(ii) determine that

the physical or

chemical

properties or

other technical

constraints of the

other available

agents preclude

their use; and

(iii) determine

that human

exposure to the

other alternative

extinguishing

agents may result

in failure to meet

safety guidelines

in the latest

edition of the

NFPA 2001 Standard

for Clean Agent

Fire Extinguishing

Systems

Documentation of

such measures

should be

available for

review upon

request.

The principal

environmental

characteristic of

concern for PFCs

is that they have

high GWPs and long

atmospheric

lifetimes. Actual

contributions to

global warming

depend upon the

quantities of PFCs

emitted.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform with relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, Subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Streaming Agents--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1211..................... C6F14 Acceptable for ...................... Users shouldreplacement.................... nonresidential uses observe the

where other limitations on

alternatives are not PFC

technically feasible acceptability by

due to performance or taking the

safety requirements: following

(a) because of their measures: (i)

physical or chemical conduct an

properties, or (b) evaluation of

where human exposure foreseeable

to the extinguishing conditions of

agents may result in end-use; (ii)

failure to meet determine that

applicable use the physical or

conditions. chemical

properties or

other technical

constraints of

the other

available agents

preclude their

use; and (iii)

determine that

human exposure

to the other

alternative

extinguishing

agents may

result in

failure to meet

applicable use

conditions

Documentation of

such measures

should be

available for

review upon

request. The

principal

environmental

characteristic

of concern for

PFCs is that

they have high

GWPs and long

atmospheric

lifetimes.

Actual

contributions to

global warming

depend upon the

quantities of

PFCs emitted.

For additional

guidance

regarding

applications in

which PFCs may

be appropriate,

users should

consult the

description of

potential uses

which is

included in the

March 18, 1994

Final Rule (59

FR 13044.) See

comments 1, 2.

Halon 1211 replacement......... HFC-236fa Acceptable in ...................... See comments 1,

nonresidential uses 2, 3.

when manufactured

using any process

that does not convert

perfluoroisobutylene

(PFIB) directly to

HFC-236fa in a single

stepHalon 1211 replacement......... HFC-227ea Acceptable in ...................... See comments 1,

nonresidential uses 2.

only

Additional comments:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1--Discharge testing and training should be strictly limited only to that which is essential to meet safety or

performance requirements.2--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.3--Acceptable for local application systems inside textile process machinery.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Total Flooding Agents--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1301 replacement............. Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

with zero or lower ODP;

OSHA regulations prohibit

its use as extinguishing

agent in fixed

extinguishing systems

where employees may be

exposed. See 29 CFR

1910.160(b)(11).----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Aerosols--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Solvent in aerosols with CFC-113, Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

MCF, or HCFC-141b. with zero or much lower

ODP.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adhesives, Coatings, and Inks--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Solvent in adhesives, coatings, and Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

inks with CFC-113. with zero or much lower

ODP.Solvent in adhesives, coatings, and Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

inks with MCF. with zero or much lower

ODP.Solvent in adhesives, coatings and Chlorobromo-methane... Unacceptable.......... Other alternatives exist

inks with HCFC-141b. with zero or much lower

ODP.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [64 FR 22996, Apr. 28, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 4201, Jan. 29, 2002]

Sec. Appendix I to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions, Listed in the April 26, 2000, Final Rule, Effective May

26, 2000

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection--Streaming Agents

[Substitutes Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End Use Substitute Decision Limitations Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1211 Streaming HCFC Blend E....... Acceptable........ Nonresidential uses As with other

Agents. only. streaming agents, EPA

recommends that

potential risks of

combustion byproducts

be labeled on the

extinguisher (see UL

2129).

See additional

comments 1, 2.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional Comments:1. Discharge testing and training should be strictly limited only to that which is essential to meet safety or

performance requirements.2. The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed. [65 FR 24392, Apr. 26, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 4202, Jan. 29, 2002]

Sec. Appendix J to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes listed in the

January 29, 2002 Final Rule, effective April 1, 2002

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Section--Total Flooding

Substitutes--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions information------------------------------------------------------------------------Total HFC Blend B Acceptable Acceptable in See additional

flooding. (Halotron II subject to areas that comments 1, 2,

). narrowed use are not 3, 4, 5.

limits. normally

occupied

only.------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910,

subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and 1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in

the event personnel should reenter the area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is

essential to meet safety or performance requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in

conjunction with testing or servicing, and recycled for later use or

destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage

related to the use of personal protective equipment (e.g., respiratory

protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or

any other occupational safety and health standard with respect to

halon substitutes.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Total Flooding

Substitutes--Unacceptable Substitutes------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further

End-Use Substitute Decision Information------------------------------------------------------------------------Halon 1301........ HBFC-22B1....... Unacceptable... HBFC-22B1 is a

Class I ozone

depleting

substance with

an ozone

depletion

potential of

0.74.Total Flooding ................ ............... The manufacturer

Agents. of this agent

terminated

production of

this agent

January 1, 1996,

except for

critical uses,

and removed it

from the market

because it is a

fetal toxin.------------------------------------------------------------------------ [67 FR 4202, Jan. 29, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 56367, Sept. 27, 2006]

Sec. Appendix K to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions and Unacceptable Substitutes Listed in the July 22, 2002,

Final Rule, Effective August 21, 2002

Foam Blowing--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Replacements for HCFC-141b in the HCFC-22, HCFC-142b and Unacceptable........... Alternatives exist with

following rigid polyurethane/ blends thereof. lower or zero-ODP.

polyisocyanurate applications:

--Boardstock

--Appliance

--SprayAll foam end-uses.................... HCFC-124............... Unacceptable........... Alternatives exist with

lower or zero-ODP.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [67 FR 47721, July 22, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 14443, Mar. 28, 2007]

Sec. Appendix L to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Listed in the

January 27, 2003, Final Rule, Effective March 28, 2003

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Total Flooding Substitutes--Acceptable Subject to Use

Conditions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total flooding............. HFC227-BC Acceptable subject Sodium bicarbonate Use of the agent,

to use conditions. release in all HFC-227ea, should

settings should be be in accordance

targeted so that with the safety

increased pH level guidelines in the

would not latest edition of

adversely affect the NFPA 2001

exposed Standard for Clean

individuals. Users Agent Fire

should provide Extinguishing

special training Systems.

to individuals See additional

required to be in comments 1, 2, 3,

environments 4, 5.

protected by

HFC227-BC

extinguishing

systems.

Each HFC227-BC

extinguisher

should be clearly

labelled with the

potential hazards

from use and safe

handling

procedures..----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments.1--Should conform with relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR part 1910, subpart L, sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Streaming Agents--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Streaming............. C6-perfluoroketone Acceptable subject to For use only in For operations that

(FK-5-1-12MYY2). narrowed use limits. nonresidential fill canisters to

areas. be used in

streaming

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventilation should

be in place;

--All spills should

be cleaned up

immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene practices;

and

--Training for safe

handling procedures

should be provided

to all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing units

filled with the

agent.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4.

Streaming............. H Galden HFPEs....... Acceptable subject to For use only in For operations that

narrowed use limits. nonresidential fill canisters to

areas. be used in

streaming

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventialtion should

be in place;

--All spills should

be cleaned up

immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene practices;

and

--Training for safe

handling procedures

should be provided

to all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing units

filled with the

agent.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments.1--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.2--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.3--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.4--As with other streaming agents, EPA recommends that potential risks of combustion by-products be labelled on

the extinguisher (see UL 2129) [68 FR 4010, Jan. 27, 2003] Sec. Appendix M to Subpart G of Part 82--Unacceptable Substitutes Listed

in the September 30, 2004 Final Rule, Effective November 29, 2004

Foam Blowing--Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Comments----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------All foam end-uses: HCFC-141b.............. Unacceptable........... Alternatives exist with

lower or zero = ODP.

--Rigid polyurethane and

polyisocyanurate laminated

boardstock

--Rigid polyurethane appliance

--Rigid polyurethane spray and

commercial refrigeration, and

sandwich panels

--Rigid polyurethane slabstock

and other foams

--Polystyrene extruded insulation

boardstock and billet

--Phenolic insulation board and

bunstock

--Flexible polyurethane

--Polystyrene extruded sheetExcept for: \1\

--Space vehicle

--Nuclear

--Defense

--Research and development for

foreign customers----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\1\ Exemptions for specific applications are identified in the list of acceptable substitutes. [69 FR 58279, Sept. 30, 2004]

Sec. Appendix N to Subpart G of Part 82 [Reserved]

Sec. Appendix O to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Listed in the

September 27, 2006 Final Rule, Effective November 27, 2006

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Total Flooding Substitutes--Acceptable Subject to Use

Conditions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Further information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total flooding........ Gelled Halocarbon/Dry Acceptable subject to Use of whichever Use of this agent

Chemical Suspension use conditions. hydrofluorocarbon should be in

(Envirogel) with gas (HFC-125, HFC- accordance with the

sodium bicarbonate 227ea, or HFC- safety guidelines

additive. 236fa) is employed in the latest

in the formulation edition of the NFPA

must be in 2001 Standard for

accordance with all Clean Agent Fire

requirements for Extinguishing

acceptability Systems, for

(i.e., narrowed use whichever

limits) of that HFC hydrofluorocarbon

under EPA's SNAP gas is employed,

program. and the latest

edition of the NFPA

2010 standard for

Aerosol

Extinguishing

Systems.

Sodium bicarbonate

release in all

settings should be

targeted so that

increased blood pH

level would not

adversely affect

exposed

individuals.

Users should provide

special training,

including the

potential hazards

associated with the

use of the HFC

agent and sodium

bicarbonate, to

individuals

required to be in

environments

protected by

Envirogel with

sodium bicarbonate

additive

extinguishing

systems.

Each extinguisher

should be clearly

labeled with the

potential hazards

from use and safe

handling

procedures.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5

Total flooding........ Powdered Aerosol D Acceptable subject to For use only in Use of this agent

(Aero-K , Stat-X ). use conditions. normally unoccupied should be in

areas. accordance with the

safety guidelines

in the latest

edition of the NFPA

2010 standard for

Aerosol

Extinguishing

Systems.

For establishments

manufacturing the

agent or filling,

installing, or

servicing

containers or

systems to be used

in total flooding

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventilation should

be in place to

reduce airborne

exposure to

constituents of

agent;

--An eye wash

fountain and quick

drench facility

should be close to

the production

area;

--Training for safe

handling procedures

should be provided

to all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing units

filled with the

agent;

--Workers

responsible for

clean up should

allow for maximum

settling of all

particulates before

reentering area and

wear appropriate

protective

equipment; and

--All spills should

be cleaned up

immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene practices.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.

Total flooding........ Powdered Aerosol E Acceptable subject to For use only in Use of this agent

(FirePro ). use conditions. normally unoccupied should be in

areas. accordance with the

safety guidelines

in the latest

edition of the NFPA

2010 standard for

Aerosol

Extinguishing

Systems.

For establishments

manufacturing the

agent or filling,

installing, or

servicing

containers or

systems to be used

in total flooding

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventilation should

be in place to

reduce airborne

exposure to

constituents of

agent;

--An eye wash

fountain and quick

drench facility

should be close to

the production

area;

--Training for safe

handling procedures

should be provided

to all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing units

filled with the

agent;

--Workers

responsible for

clean up should

allow for maximum

settling of all

particulates before

reentering area and

wear appropriate

protective

equipment; and

--All spills should

be cleaned up

immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene practices.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.Total flooding........ Phosphorous Acceptable subject to For use only in For establishments

Tribromide (PBr3). use conditions. aircraft engine manufacturing the

nacelles. agent or filling,

installing, or

servicing

containers or

systems, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventilation should

be in place and/or

positive pressure,

self-contained

breathing apparatus

(SCBA) should be

worn;

--Training for safe

handling procedures

should be provided

to all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing units

filled with the

agent; and

--All spills should

be cleaned up

immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene practices.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes. [71 FR 56367, Sept. 27, 2006]

Sec. Appendix P to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Listed in the

September 27, 2006 Final Rule, Effective November 27, 2006

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Total Flooding Agents--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use

Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Further information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total flooding........ Gelled Halocarbon/Dry Acceptable subject to For use only in Use of this agent

Chemical Suspension narrowed use limits. normally unoccupied should be in

with any agent other areas. accordance with the

than ammonium safety guidelines

polyphosphate or in the latest

sodium bicarbonate edition of the NFPA

additive (Envirogel 2001 Standard for

with sodium Clean Agent Fire

bicarbonate Extinguishing

additive). Systems, for

whichever

hydrofluorocarbon

gas is employed.

Envirogel is listed

as a streaming

substitute under

the generic name

Gelled Halocarbon/

Dry Chemical

Suspension.

Envirogel was also

previously listed

as a total flooding

substitute under

the same generic

name.

EPA has found

Envirogel with the

ammonium

polyphosphate

additive and

Envirogel with the

sodium bicarbonate

additive to be

acceptable as total

flooding agents in

both occupied and

unoccupied areas.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4, 5----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance

requirements.4--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.5--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes. [71 FR 56367, Sept. 27, 2006] Sec. Appendix Q to Subpart G of Part 82--Unacceptable Substitutes Listed

in the March 28, 2007 Final Rule, Effective May 29, 2007

Foam Blowing Unacceptable Substitutes----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

End use Substitute Decision Further information------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Rigid polyurethane commercial HCFC-22; HCFC-142b as Unacceptable \1\....... Alternatives exist with

refrigeration. substitutes for HCFC- lower or zero-ODP.--Rigid polyurethane sandwich panels. 141b.--Rigid polyurethane slabstock and

other foams.--Rigid polyurethane and HCFC-22; HCFC-142b as Unacceptable \2\....... Alternatives exist with

polyisocyanurate laminated substitutes for CFCs. lower or zero-ODP.

boardstock.--Rigid polyurethane appliance.......--Rigid polyurethane spray and

commercial refrigeration, and

sandwich panels.--Rigid polyurethane slabstock and

other foams.--Polystyrene extruded insulation

boardstock and billet.--Phenolic insulation board and

bunstock.--Flexible polyurethane.--Polystyrene extruded sheet.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\1\ For existing users of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b as of November 4, 2005 other than in marine applications, the

unacceptability determination is effective on March 1, 2008; for existing users of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b as of

November 4, 2005 in marine applications, including marine flotation foam, the unacceptability determination is

effective on September 1, 2009. For an existing user of HCFC-22 or HCFC-142b that currently operates in only

one facility that it does not own, and is scheduled to transition to a non-ODS, flammable alternative to

coincide with a move to a new facility and installation of new process equipment that cannot be completed by

March 1, 2008, the unacceptability determination is effective January 1, 2010.\2\ For existing users of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in polystyrene extruded insulation boardstock and billet and the

other foam end uses, as of November 4, 2005, the unacceptability determination is effective on January 1,

2010. [72 FR 14442, Mar. 28, 2007]

Sec. Appendix R to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Subject to Use

Restrictions Listed in the December 20, 2011, final rule, Effective

February 21, 2012, and in the April 10, 2015 Final Rule, Effective May

11, 2015

Substitutes That Are Acceptable Subject to Use Conditions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further

End-use Substitute Decision Use conditions information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Household refrigerators, Isobutane (R-600a) Acceptable subject These refrigerants Applicable OSHA

freezers, and combination Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. may be used only requirements at

refrigerators and freezers. R-441A............ in new equipment 29 CFR part 1910(New equipment only)............ designed must be followed,

specifically and including those

clearly at 29 CFR

identified for 1910.106

the refrigerant (flammable and

(i.e., none of combustible

these substitutes liquids),

may be used as a 1910.110 (storage

conversion or and handling of

``retrofit'' liquefied

refrigerant for petroleum gases),

existing 1910.157

equipment (portable fire

designed for a extinguishers),

different and 1910.1000

refrigerant). (toxic and

These refrigerants hazardous

may be used only substances).

in a refrigerator Proper ventilation

or freezer, or should be

combination maintained at all

refrigerator and times during the

freezer, that manufacture and

meets all storage of

requirements equipment

listed in containing

Supplement SA to hydrocarbon

the 10th edition refrigerants

of the through adherence

Underwriters to good

Laboratories (UL) manufacturing

Standard for practices as per

Household 29 CFR 1910.106.

Refrigerators and If refrigerant

Freezers, UL 250, levels in the air

dated August 25, surrounding the

2000. In cases equipment rise

where the final above one-fourth

rule includes of the lower

requirements more flammability

stringent than limit, the space

those of the 10th should be

edition of UL evacuated and re-

250, the entry should

appliance must occur only after

meet the the space has

requirements of been properly

the final rule in ventilated.

place of the Technicians and

requirements in equipment

the UL Standard. manufacturers

The charge size should wear

must not exceed appropriate

57 g (2.01 oz) in personal

any refrigerator, protective

freezer, or equipment,

combination including

refrigerator and chemical goggles

freezer in each and protective

circuit. gloves, when

handling these

refrigerants.

Special care

should be taken

to avoid contact

with the skin

since these

refrigerants,

like many

refrigerants, can

cause freeze

burns on the

skin.

A Class B dry

powder type fire

extinguisher

should be kept

nearby.

Technicians should

only use spark-

proof tools when

working on

refrigerators and

freezers with

these

refrigerants.

Any recovery

equipment used

should be

designed for

flammable

refrigerants.

Any refrigerant

releases should

be in a well-

ventilated area,

such as outside

of a building.

Only technicians

specifically

trained in

handling

flammable

refrigerants

should service

refrigerators and

freezers

containing these

refrigerants.

Technicians

should gain an

understanding of

minimizing the

risk of fire and

the steps to use

flammable

refrigerants

safely.

Household refrigerators, Isobutane (R-600a) Acceptable subject As provided in Room occupants

freezers, and combination Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. clauses SA6.1.1 should evacuate

refrigerators and freezers. R-441A............ and SA6.1.2 of UL the space(New equipment only)............ Standard 250, immediately

10th edition, the following the

following accidental

markings must be release of this

attached at the refrigerant.

locations If a service port

provided and must is added then

be permanent: household

(a) On or near any refrigerators,

evaporators that freezers, and

can be contacted combination

by the consumer: refrigerator and

``DANGER- Risk of freezers using

Fire or these

Explosion. refrigerants

Flammable should have

Refrigerant Used. service aperture

Do Not Use fittings that

Mechanical differ from

Devices To fittings used in

Defrost equipment or

Refrigerator. Do containers using

Not Puncture non-flammable

Refrigerant refrigerant.

Tubing.''. ``Differ'' means

(b) Near the that either the

machine diameter differs

compartment: by at least 1/16

``DANGER--Risk of inch or the

Fire or thread direction

Explosion. is reversed

Flammable (i.e., right-

Refrigerant Used. handed vs. left-

To Be Repaired handed). These

Only By Trained different

Service fittings should

Personnel. Do Not be permanently

Puncture affixed to the

Refrigerant unit at the point

Tubing.''. of service and

(c) Near the maintained until

machine the end-of-life

compartment: of the unit, and

``CAUTION--Risk should not be

of Fire or accessed with an

Explosion. adaptor.

Flammable

Refrigerant Used.

Consult Repair

Manual/Owner's

Guide Before

Attempting To

Service This

Product. All

Safety

Precautions Must

Be Followed.''.

(d) On the

exterior of the

refrigerator:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Dispose of

Properly In

Accordance With

Federal Or Local

Regulations.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

(e) Near any and

all exposed

refrigerant

tubing:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion Due To

Puncture Of

Refrigerant

Tubing; Follow

Handling

Instructions

Carefully.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

All of these

markings must be

in letters no

less than 6.4 mm

(1/4 inch) high.

The refrigerator,

freezer, or

combination

refrigerator and

freezer must have

red, Pantone

Matching System

(PMS) #185 marked

pipes, hoses, or

other devices

through which the

refrigerant is

serviced

(typically known

as the service

port) to indicate

the use of a

flammable

refrigerant. This

color must be

present at all

service ports and

where service

puncturing or

otherwise

creating an

opening from the

refrigerant

circuit to the

atmosphere might

be expected

(e.g., process

tubes). The color

mark must extend

at least 2.5

centimeters (1

inch) from the

compressor and

must be replaced

if removed.

Retail food refrigerators and Isobutane (R-600a) Acceptable subject As provided in Room occupants

freezers (stand-alone units Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. clauses SB6.1.2 should evacuate

only). R-441A............ to SB6.1.5 of UL the space(New equipment only)............ Standard 471, immediately

10th edition, the following the

following accidental

markings must be release of this

attached at the refrigerant.

locations If a service port

provided and must is added then

be permanent: retail food

(a) On or near any refrigerators and

evaporators that freezers using

can be contacted these

by the consumer: refrigerants

``DANGER--Risk of should have

Fire or service aperture

Explosion. fittings that

Flammable differ from

Refrigerant Used. fittings used in

Do Not Use equipment or

Mechanical containers using

Devices To non-flammable

Defrost refrigerant.

Refrigerator. Do ``Differ'' means

Not Puncture that either the

Refrigerant diameter differs

Tubing.''. by at least 1/16

(b) Near the inch or the

machine thread direction

compartment: is reversed

``DANGER--Risk of (i.e., right-

Fire or handed vs. left-

Explosion. handed). These

Flammable different

Refrigerant Used. fittings should

To Be Repaired be permanently

Only By Trained affixed to the

Service unit at the point

Personnel. Do Not of service and

Puncture maintained until

Refrigerant the end-of-life

Tubing.''. of the unit, and

(c) Near the should not be

machine accessed with an

compartment: adaptor.

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Flammable

Refrigerant Used.

Consult Repair

Manual/Owner's

Guide Before

Attempting To

Service This

Product. All

Safety

Precautions Must

be Followed.''.

(d) On the

exterior of the

refrigerator:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Dispose of

Properly In

Accordance With

Federal Or Local

Regulations.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

(e) Near any and

all exposed

refrigerant

tubing:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion Due To

Puncture Of

Refrigerant

Tubing; Follow

Handling

Instructions

Carefully.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

All of these

markings must be

in letters no

less than 6.4 mm

(1/4 inch) high.

The refrigerator

or freezer must

have red,

Pantone Matching

System (PMS) #185

marked pipes,

hoses, and other

devices through

which the

refrigerant is

serviced,

typically known

as the service

port, to indicate

the use of a

flammable

refrigerant. This

color must be

present at all

service ports and

where service

puncturing or

otherwise

creating an

opening from the

refrigerant

circuit to the

atmosphere might

be expected

(e.g., process

tubes). The color

mark must extend

at least 2.5

centimeters (1

inch) from the

compressor and

must be replaced

if removed.

Very low temperature Ethane (R-170).... Acceptable subject This refrigerant Applicable OSHA

refrigeration. to use conditions. may be used only requirements atNon-mechanical heat transfer.... in new equipment 29 CFR part 1910(New equipment only)............ specifically must be followed,

designed and including those

clearly at 29 CFR 1910.94

identified for (ventilation) and

the refrigerant 1910.106

(i.e., the (flammable and

substitute may combustible

not be used as a liquids),

conversion or 1910.110 (storage

``retrofit'' and handling of

refrigerant for liquefied

existing petroleum gases),

equipment 1910.157

designed for (portable fire

other extinguishers),

refrigerants). and 1910.1000

This refrigerant (toxic and

may only be used hazardous

in equipment that substances).

meets all Proper ventilation

requirements in should be

Supplement SB to maintained at all

the 10th edition times during the

of the manufacture and

Underwriters storage of

Laboratories (UL) equipment

Standard for containing

Commercial hydrocarbon

Refrigerators and refrigerants

Freezers, UL 471, through adherence

dated November to good

24, 2010. In manufacturing

cases where the practices as per

final rule 29 CFR 1910.106.

includes If refrigerant

requirements more levels in the air

stringent than surrounding the

those of the 10th equipment rise

edition of UL above one-fourth

471, the of the lower

appliance must flammability

meet the limit, the space

requirements of should be

the final rule in evacuated and re-

place of the entry should

requirements in occur only after

the UL Standard. the space has

The charge size been properly

for the equipment ventilated.

must not exceed Technicians and

150 g (5.29 oz) equipment

in each circuit. manufacturers

should wear

appropriate

personal

protective

equipment,

including

chemical goggles

and protective

gloves, when

handling ethane.

Special care

should be taken

to avoid contact

with the skin

since ethane,

like many

refrigerants, can

cause freeze

burns on the

skin.

A Class B dry

powder type fire

extinguisher

should be kept

nearby.

Technicians should

only use spark-

proof tools when

working on

equipment with

flammable

refrigerants.

Any recovery

equipment used

should be

designed for

flammable

refrigerants.

Any refrigerant

releases should

be in a well-

ventilated area,

such as outside

of a building.

Only technicians

specifically

trained in

handling

flammable

refrigerants

should service

equipment

containing

ethane.

Technicians

should gain an

understanding of

minimizing the

risk of fire and

the steps to use

flammable

refrigerants

safely.

Very low temperature Ethane (R-170).... Acceptable subject As provided in Room occupants

refrigeration. to use conditions. clauses SB6.1.2 should evacuateNon-mechanical heat transfer.... to SB6.1.5 of UL the space(New equipment only)............ Standard 471, immediately

10th edition, the following the

following accidental

markings must be release of this

attached at the refrigerant.

locations If a service port

provided and must is added then

be permanent: refrigeration

(a) On or near any equipment using

evaporators that this refrigerant

can be contacted should have

by the consumer: service aperture

``DANGER--Risk of fittings that

Fire or differ from

Explosion. fittings used in

Flammable equipment or

Refrigerant Used. containers using

Do Not Use non-flammable

Mechanical refrigerant.

Devices To ``Differ'' means

Defrost that either the

Refrigerator. Do diameter differs

Not Puncture by at least 1/16

Refrigerant inch or the

Tubing.''. thread direction

(b) Near the is reversed

machine (i.e., right-

compartment: handed vs. left-

``DANGER--Risk of handed). These

Fire or different

Explosion. fittings should

Flammable be permanently

Refrigerant Used. affixed to the

To Be Repaired unit at the point

Only By Trained of service and

Service maintained until

Personnel. Do Not the end-of-life

Puncture of the unit, and

Refrigerant should not be

Tubing.''. accessed with an

(c) Near the adaptor.

machine Example of non-

compartment: mechanical heat

``CAUTION--Risk transfer using

of Fire or this refrigerant

Explosion. would be use in a

Flammable secondary loop of

Refrigerant Used. a thermosiphon.

Consult Repair

Manual/Owner's

Guide Before

Attempting To

Service This

Product. All

Safety

Precautions Must

be Followed.''.

(d) On the

exterior of the

refrigerator:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Dispose of

Properly In

Accordance With

Federal Or Local

Regulations.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

(e) Near any and

all exposed

refrigerant

tubing:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion Due To

Puncture Of

Refrigerant

Tubing; Follow

Handling

Instructions

Carefully.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

All of these

markings must be

in letters no

less than 6.4 mm

(1/4 inch) high.

The refrigeration

equipment must

have red,

Pantone Matching

System (PMS) #185

marked pipes,

hoses, and other

devices through

which the

refrigerant is

serviced,

typically known

as the service

port, to indicate

the use of a

flammable

refrigerant. This

color must be

present at all

service ports and

where service

puncturing or

otherwise

creating an

opening from the

refrigerant

circuit to the

atmosphere might

be expected

(e.g., process

tubes). The color

mark must extend

at least 2.5

centimeters (1

inch) from the

compressor and

must be replaced

if removed.

Vending Machines................ Isobutane (R-600a) Acceptable subject These refrigerants Applicable OSHA(New equipment only)............ Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. may be used only requirements at

R-441A............ in new equipment 29 part 1910 must

specifically be followed,

designed and including those

clearly at 29 CFR 1910.94

identified for (ventilation) and

the refrigerants 1910.106

(i.e., none of (flammable and

these substitutes combustible

may be used as a liquids),

conversion or 1910.110 (storage

``retrofit'' and handling of

refrigerant for liquefied

existing petroleum gases),

equipment 1910.157

designed for (portable fire

other extinguishers),

refrigerants). and 1910.1000

Detaching and (toxic and

replacing the old hazardous

refrigeration substances).

circuit from the Proper ventilation

outer casing of should be

the equipment maintained at all

with a new one times during the

containing a new manufacture and

evaporator, storage of

condenser, and equipment

refrigerant containing

tubing within the hydrocarbon

old casing is refrigerants

considered through adherence

``new'' equipment to good

and not a manufacturing

retrofit of the practices as per

old, existing 29 CFR 1910.106.

equipment. If refrigerant

These substitutes levels in the air

may only be used surrounding the

in equipment that equipment rise

meets all above one-fourth

requirements in of the lower

Supplement SA to flammability

the 7th edition limit, the space

of the should be

Underwriters evacuated and re-

Laboratories (UL) entry should

Standard for occur only after

Refrigerated the space has

Vending Machines, been properly

UL 541, dated ventilated.

December, 2011. Technicians and

In cases where equipment

the final rule manufacturers

includes should wear

requirements more appropriate

stringent than personal

those of the 7th protective

edition of UL equipment,

541, the including

appliance must chemical goggles

meet the and protective

requirements of gloves, when

the final rule in handling these

place of the refrigerants.

requirements in Special care

the UL Standard. should be taken

The charge size to avoid contact

for vending with the skin

machines must not since these

exceed 150 g refrigerants,

(5.29 oz) in each like many

circuit. refrigerants, can

cause freeze

burns on the

skin.

A Class B dry

powder type fire

extinguisher

should be kept

nearby.

Technicians should

only use spark-

proof tools when

working on

refrigeration

equipment with

flammable

refrigerants.

Any recovery

equipment used

should be

designed for

flammable

refrigerants.

Any refrigerant

releases should

be in a well-

ventilated area,

such as outside

of a building.

Only technicians

specifically

trained in

handling

flammable

refrigerants

should service

refrigeration

equipment

containing these

refrigerants.

Technicians

should gain an

understanding of

minimizing the

risk of fire and

the steps to use

flammable

refrigerants

safely.

Vending Machines................ Isobutane (R-600a) Acceptable subject As provided in Room occupants(New equipment only)............ Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. clauses SA6.1.2 should evacuate

R-441A............ to SA6.1.5 of UL the space

Standard 541, 7th immediately

edition, the following the

following accidental

markings must be release of this

attached at the refrigerant.

locations If a service port

provided and must is added then

be permanent: refrigeration

(a) On or near any equipment using

evaporators that this refrigerant

can be contacted should have

by the consumer: service aperture

``DANGER--Risk of fittings that

Fire or differ from

Explosion. fittings used in

Flammable equipment or

Refrigerant Used. containers using

Do Not Use non-flammable

Mechanical refrigerant.

Devices To ``Differ'' means

Defrost that either the

Refrigerator. Do diameter differs

Not Puncture by at least 1/16

Refrigerant inch or the

Tubing.''. thread direction

(b) Near the is reversed

machine (i.e., right-

compartment: handed vs. left-

``DANGER--Risk of handed). These

Fire or different

Explosion. fittings should

Flammable be permanently

Refrigerant Used. affixed to the

To Be Repaired unit at the point

Only By Trained of service and

Service maintained until

Personnel. Do Not the end-of-life

Puncture of the unit, and

Refrigerant should not be

Tubing.''. accessed with an

(c) Near the adaptor.

machine

compartment:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Flammable

Refrigerant Used.

Consult Repair

Manual/Owner's

Guide Before

Attempting To

Service This

Product. All

Safety

Precautions Must

be Followed.''.

(d) On the

exterior of the

refrigerator:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion.

Dispose of

Properly In

Accordance With

Federal Or Local

Regulations.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

(e) Near any and

all exposed

refrigerant

tubing:

``CAUTION--Risk

of Fire or

Explosion Due To

Puncture Of

Refrigerant

Tubing; Follow

Handling

Instructions

Carefully.

Flammable

Refrigerant

Used.''.

All of these

markings must be

in letters no

less than 6.4 mm

(1/4 inch) high.

The refrigeration

equipment must

have red,

Pantone Matching

System (PMS) #185

marked pipes,

hoses, and other

devices through

which the

refrigerant is

serviced,

typically known

as the service

port, to indicate

the use of a

flammable

refrigerant. This

color must be

present at all

service ports and

where service

puncturing or

otherwise

creating an

opening from the

refrigerant

circuit to the

atmosphere might

be expected

(e.g., process

tubes). The color

mark must extend

at least 2.5

centimeters (1

inch) from the

compressor and

must be replaced

if removed.

Residential and light-commercial HFC-32............ Acceptable subject These refrigerants Applicable OSHA

air conditioning and heat Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. may be used only requirements at

pumps--self-contained room air R-441A............ in new equipment 29 CFR part 1910

conditioners only. specifically must be followed,(New equipment only)............ designed and including those

clearly at 29 CFR 1910.94

identified for (ventilation) and

the refrigerants 1910.106

(i.e., none of (flammable and

these substitutes combustible

may be used as a liquids),

conversion or 1910.110 (storage

``retrofit'' and handling of

refrigerant for liquefied

existing petroleum gases),

equipment 1910.157

designed for (portable fire

other extinguishers),

refrigerants) and 1910.1000

These refrigerants (toxic and

may only be used hazardous

in equipment that substances).

meets all Proper ventilation

requirements in should be

Supplement SA and maintained at all

Appendices B times during the

through F of the manufacture and

8th edition of storage of

the Underwriters equipment

Laboratories (UL) containing

Standard for Room hydrocarbon

Air Conditioners, refrigerants

UL 484, dated through adherence

August 3, 2012. to good

In cases where manufacturing

the final rule practices as per

includes 29 CFR 1910.106.

requirements more If refrigerant

stringent than levels in the air

those of the 8th surrounding the

edition of UL equipment rise

484, the above one-fourth

appliance must of the lower

meet the flammability

requirements of limit, the space

the final rule in should be

place of the evacuated and re-

requirements in entry should

the UL Standard. occur only after

The charge size the space has

for the entire been properly

air conditioner ventilated.

must not exceed Technicians and

the maximum equipment

refrigerant mass manufacturers

determined should wear

according to appropriate

Appendix F of UL personal

484, 8th edition protective

for the room size equipment,

where the air including

conditioner is chemical goggles

used. The charge and protective

size for these gloves, when

three handling these

refrigerants must refrigerants.

in no case exceed Special care

7,960 g (280.8 oz should be taken

or 17.55 lb) of to avoid contact

HFC-32; 1,000 g with the skin

(35.3 oz or 2.21 since these

lbs) of propane; refrigerants,

or 1,000 g (35.3 like many

oz or 2.21 lb) of refrigerants, can

R-441A. For cause freeze

portable air burns on the

conditioners, the skin.

charge size must A Class B dry

in no case exceed powder type fire

2,450 g (80.0 oz extinguisher

or 5.0 lb) of HFC- should be kept

32; 300 g (10.6 nearby.

oz or 0.66 lbs) Technicians should

of propane; or only use spark-

330 g (11.6 oz or proof tools when

0.72 lb) of R- working on air

441A. The conditioning

manufacturer must equipment with

design a charge flammable

size for the refrigerants.

entire air Any recovery

conditioner that equipment used

does not exceed should be

the amount designed for

specified for the flammable

unit's cooling refrigerants.

capacity, as Any refrigerant

specified in releases should

Table A, B, C, D, be in a well-

or E of this ventilated area,

Appendix. such as outside

of a building.

Only technicians

specifically

trained in

handling

flammable

refrigerants

should service

refrigeration

equipment

containing these

refrigerants.

Technicians

should gain an

understanding of

minimizing the

risk of fire and

the steps to use

flammable

refrigerants

safely.

Residential and light-commercial HFC-32............ Acceptable subject As provided in Room occupants

air conditioning and heat Propane (R-290)... to use conditions. clauses SA6.1.2 should evacuate

pumps--self-contained room air R-441A............ to SA6.1.5 of UL the space

conditioners only. 484, 8th edition, immediately(New equipment only)............ the following following the

markings must be accidental

attached at the release of this

locations refrigerant.

provided and must If a service port

be permanent:. is added then air

(a) On the outside conditioning

of the air equipment using

conditioner: this refrigerant

``DANGER--Risk of should have

Fire or service aperture

Explosion. fittings that

Flammable differ from

Refrigerant Used. fittings used in

To Be Repaired equipment or

Only By Trained containers using

Service non-flammable

Personnel. Do Not refrigerant.

Puncture ``Differ'' means

Refrigerant that either the

Tubing.''. diameter differs

(b) On the outside by at least 1/16

of the air inch or the

conditioner: thread direction

``CAUTION--Risk is reversed

of Fire or (i.e., right-

Explosion. handed vs. left-

Dispose of handed). These

Properly In different

Accordance With fittings should

Federal Or Local be permanently

Regulations. affixed to the

Flammable unit at the point

Refrigerant of service and

Used.''. maintained until

(c) On the inside the end-of-life

of the air of the unit, and

conditioner near should not be

the compressor: accessed with an

``CAUTION--Risk adaptor.

of Fire or Air conditioning

Explosion. equipment in this

Flammable category

Refrigerant Used. includes:

Consult Repair Window air

Manual/Owner's conditioning

Guide Before units.

Attempting To Portable room air

Service This conditioners.

Product. All Packaged terminal

Safety air conditioners

Precautions Must and heat pumps.

be Followed.''.

(d) On the outside

of each portable

air conditioner:

``WARNING:

Appliance hall be

installed,

operated and

stored in a room

with a floor area

larger the ``X''

m\2\ (Y ft\2\).''

The value ``X''

on the label must

be determined

using the minimum

room size in m\2\

calculated using

Appendix F of UL

484, 8th edition.

For R-441A, use a

lower

flammability

limit of 0.041 kg/

m\3\ in

calculations in

Appendix F of UL

484, 8th edition.

All of these

markings must be

in letters no

less than 6.4 mm

(1/4 inch) high.

The air

conditioning

equipment must

have red,

Pantone Matching

System (PMS) #185

marked pipes,

hoses, and other

devices through

which the

refrigerant is

serviced,

typically known

as the service

port, to indicate

the use of a

flammable

refrigerant. This

color must be

present at all

service ports and

where service

puncturing or

otherwise

creating an

opening from the

refrigerant

circuit to the

atmosphere might

be expected

(e.g., process

tubes). The color

mark must extend

at least 2.5

centimeters (1

inch) from the

compressor and

must be replaced

if removed.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Note: The use conditions in this appendix contain references to certain standards from Underwriters Laboratories

Inc. (UL). The standards are incorporated by reference, and the referenced sections are made part of the

regulations in part 82:1. UL 250: Household Refrigerators and Freezers. 10th edition. Supplement SA: Requirements for Refrigerators and

Freezers Employing a Flammable Refrigerant in the Refrigerating System. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. August

25, 2000.2. UL 471. Commercial Refrigerators and Freezers. 10th edition. Supplement SB: Requirements for Refrigerators

and Freezers Employing a Flammable Refrigerant in the Refrigerating System. Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.

November 24, 2010.3. UL 484. Room Air Conditioners. 8th edition. Supplement SA: Requirements for Room Air Conditioners Employing a

Flammable Refrigerant in the Refrigerating System and Appendices B through F. December 21, 2007, with changes

through August 3, 2012.4. UL 541. Refrigerated Vending Machines. 7th edition. Supplement SA: Requirements for Refrigerated Venders

Employing a Flammable Refrigerant in the Refrigerating System. December 30, 2011The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)

and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of UL Standards 250, 471, 484 and 541 may be purchased by mail at: COMM 2000; 151

Eastern Avenue; Bensenville, IL 60106; Email: orders@comm-2000.com; Telephone: 1-888-853-3503 in the U.S. or

Canada (other countries dial +1-415-352-2168); Internet address: http://ulstandardsinfonet.ul.com/ or www.comm-

2000.com.

You may inspect a copy at U.S. EPA's Air and Radiation Docket; EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution

Ave. NW., Washington DC or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For questions regarding

access to these standards, the telephone number of EPA's Air and Radiation Docket is 202-566-1742. For

information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/

federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR10AP15.002

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR10AP15.003 [80 FR 19491, Apr. 10, 2015]

Sec. Appendix S to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes Listed in the

September 19, 2012 Final Rule, Effective December 18, 2012.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Acceptable Subject To Use Conditions----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further

End-Use Substitute Decision Conditions information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Total Flooding.................. Powdered Aerosol F Acceptable subject For use only in Use of this agent

(KSA) as a to use conditions. normally should be in

substitute for unoccupied areas. accordance with

Halon 1301. the safety

guidelines in the

latest edition of

the NFPA 2010

standard for

Aerosol

Extinguishing

Systems.

For establishments

filling,

installing,

servicing, using,

or disposing of

containers or

systems to be

used in total

flooding

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--appropriate

protective

clothing (e.g.,

goggles,

particulate

removing

respirators, and

gloves) should be

worn during the

installation and

maintenance of

the extinguishing

units filled with

the agent or

during clean up

and disposal of

this agent;

--training should

be provided to

all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing

units filled with

the agent,

required to clean

up after

discharge or

required to work

near spaces

protected by

Powdered Aerosol

F.

Releases in all

settings should

be limited to an

appropriate

design

concentration for

the protected

space so that

increased blood

pH level would

not adversely

affect exposed

individuals.

Exposed

individuals

should be given

an electrolyte

solution to drink

afterwards to

restore the pH

within the

appropriate

range.

Each extinguisher

should be clearly

labeled with the

potential hazards

from use and safe

handling

procedures.

In the case of an

accidental spill,

the area should

be well-

ventilated, and

workers should

wear protective

equipment while

following good

industrial

hygiene practices

for clean-up and

disposal.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4.

Total Flooding.................. Powdered Aerosol G Acceptable subject For use only in Use of this agent

(Dry Sprinkler to use conditions. normally should be in

Powdered Aerosol unoccupied areas. accordance with

(DSPA) Fixed the safety

Generators) as a guidelines in the

substitute for latest edition of

Halon 1301. the NFPA 2010

standard for

Aerosol

Extinguishing

Systems.

For establishments

filling,

installing,

servicing, using

or disposing of

generator units

or systems in

total flooding

applications, EPA

recommends the

appropriate

protective

clothing (e.g.,

goggles,

particulate

removing

respirators, and

gloves) should be

worn during the

installation and

maintenance of

the extinguishing

units filled with

the agent or

during clean up

and disposal of

this agent.

Powdered Aerosol G

should be

collected by hand

(e.g., with a

dustpan and

duster or a

vacuum cleaner);

waste should be

collected in

suitable drums

for disposal and

the area should

be washed clean

with sufficient

quantities of

water; and

training should

be provided to

all employees

that would be

likely to handle

the agent or

generator units

filled containing

the agent,

required to clean

up after

discharge or

required to work

near spaces

protected by

Powdered Aerosol

G fixed generator

total flooding

systems.

In accordance with

Department of

Health and Human

Services

regulations (42

CFR Part 84),

safety glasses

and a NIOSH/CDC-

approved N99

respirator are

required for

individuals

installing

Powdered Aerosol

G fixed systems.

Each generator

unit should be

clearly labeled

with the

potential hazards

from use and safe

handling

procedures.

In the case of an

accidental

discharge, the

area should be

well-ventilated,

and workers

should wear

protective

equipment while

following good

industrial

hygiene practices

for clean-up and

disposal.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, Subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.4--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes. [77 FR 58043, Sept. 19, 2012; Appendix T to Subpart G of Part 82--Substitutes listed in the April 29,

2013 Final Rule, effective May 29, 2013.

Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection Sector--Acceptable Subject to Narrowed Use Limits----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further

End-use Substitute Decision Conditions Information----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Streaming....................... C7 Fluoro-ketone Acceptable subject For use only in Use of this agent

as a substitute to narrowed use non-residential should be in

for Halon 1211. limits. applications. accordance with

the latest

edition of NFPA

Standard 10 for

Portable Fire

Extinguishers.

For operations

that fill

canisters to be

used in streaming

applications, EPA

recommends the

following:

--Adequate

ventilation

should be in

place;

--All spills

should be cleaned

up immediately in

accordance with

good industrial

hygiene

practices; and

--Training for

safe handling

procedures should

be provided to

all employees

that would be

likely to handle

containers of the

agent or

extinguishing

units filled with

the agent.

See additional

comments 1, 2, 3,

4.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Additional comments:1--Should conform to relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, Subpart L, Sections 1910.160 and

1910.162.2--Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the

area.3--The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and

recycled for later use or destroyed.4--EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective

equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other

occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes. [78 FR 25002, Apr. 29, 2013]