(a)(1) If the average monthly number of cases receiving assistance, including assistance under a separate State program (as provided at Sec. 261.42(b)), in a State in the preceding fiscal year was lower than the average monthly number of cases that received assistance, including assistance under a separate State program in that State in FY 2005, the minimum overall participation rate the State must meet for the fiscal year (as provided at Sec. 261.21) decreases by the number of percentage points the prior-year caseload fell in comparison to the FY 2005 caseload.
(1) If the average monthly number of cases receiving assistance, including assistance under a separate State program (as provided at Sec. 261.42(b)), in a State in the preceding fiscal year was lower than the average monthly number of cases that received assistance, including assistance under a separate State program in that State in FY 2005, the minimum overall participation rate the State must meet for the fiscal year (as provided at Sec. 261.21) decreases by the number of percentage points the prior-year caseload fell in comparison to the FY 2005 caseload.
(2) The minimum two-parent participation rate the State must meet for the fiscal year (as provided at Sec. 261.23) decreases, at State option, by either:
(i) The number of percentage points the prior-year two-parent caseload, including two-parent cases receiving assistance under a separate State program (as provided at Sec. 261.42(b)), fell in comparison to the FY 2005 two-parent caseload, including two-parent cases receiving assistance under a separate State program; or
(ii) The number of percentage points the prior-year overall caseload, including assistance under a separate State program (as provided at Sec. 261.42(b)), fell in comparison to the FY 2005 overall caseload, including cases receiving assistance under a separate State program.
(3) For the credit calculation, we will refer to the fiscal year that precedes the fiscal year to which the credit applies as the ``comparison year.''
(b)(1) The calculations in paragraph (a) of this section must disregard caseload reductions due to requirements of Federal law and to changes that a State has made in its eligibility criteria in comparison to its criteria in effect in FY 2005.
(1) The calculations in paragraph (a) of this section must disregard caseload reductions due to requirements of Federal law and to changes that a State has made in its eligibility criteria in comparison to its criteria in effect in FY 2005.
(2) At State option, the calculation may offset the disregard of caseload reductions in paragraph (b)(1) of this section by changes in eligibility criteria that increase caseloads.
(c)(1) To establish the caseload base for FY 2005 and to determine the comparison-year caseload, we will use the combined TANF and Separate State Program caseload figures reported on the Form ACF-199, TANF Data Report, and Form ACF-209, SSP-MOE Data Report, respectively.
(1) To establish the caseload base for FY 2005 and to determine the comparison-year caseload, we will use the combined TANF and Separate State Program caseload figures reported on the Form ACF-199, TANF Data Report, and Form ACF-209, SSP-MOE Data Report, respectively.
(2) To qualify for a caseload reduction, a State must have reported monthly caseload information, including cases in separate State programs, for FY 2005 and the comparison year for cases receiving assistance as defined at Sec. 261.43.
(d)(1) A State may correct erroneous data or submit accurate data to adjust program data or to include unduplicated cases within the fiscal year.
(1) A State may correct erroneous data or submit accurate data to adjust program data or to include unduplicated cases within the fiscal year.
(2) We will adjust both the FY 2005 baseline and the comparison-year caseload information, as appropriate, based on these State submissions.
(e) We refer to the number of percentage points by which a caseload falls, disregarding the cases described in paragraph (b) of this section, as a caseload reduction credit.